Misconceptions About the MBTI® Assessment
More About Personality Type

"The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances: if there is any reaction, both are transformed."
Carl Jung

As you explore concepts of personality type and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI®) assessment, you may encounter information on the web that criticizes the Indicator and questions its value and efficacy.


Many of these criticisms can be traced back to misunderstandings about the framework of the MBTI assessment, and misconceptions about the characteristics of the instrument and the way it is designed to be used. A few common misconceptions include:


"The MBTI assessment isn't reliable."

Articles that criticize the MBTI assessment often quote a statistic from David Pittenger that claims a 50 percent retest rate over a 5-week retest period. Yet this widely circulated number originates from a 1993 study citing an even older 1979 study based on an outdated form of the MBTI instrument, not the current version. Research in the MBTI® Manual shows that over a 4-week retest period, 65 percent of respondents had all four preferences the same, and 93 percent had three or four the same. The MBTI® Form M Manual Supplement (2009) shows test-retest reliabilities up to four years ranging from .57 to .81 and one-month test-reliabilities of .94 to .97.


"The MBTI assessment isn't predictive."

The MBTI assessment is designed to be descriptive, not predictive. Organizations that wrongly use the MBTI assessment for hiring decisions are confusing preference with skill, and are doing themselves a disservice in their hiring process by screening out potentially qualified applicants. It is unethical, and in many cases illegal, to require job applicants to take the Indicator if the results will be used to screen out applicants.


"Psychologists don't use the MBTI assessment."

Clinical psychology is largely focused on the diagnosis and treatment of psychopathology. The MBTI assessment is designed to be descriptive of the typical characteristics of people with different personality types, not to be diagnostic. Today thousands of psychologists use the MBTI assessment for appropriate non-diagnostic applications.


Here is a list of resources that address these misunderstandings and inaccuracies, and help to set the record straight about the meaning of personality type as measured by the MBTI instrument:

My MBTI Personality Type
MBTI® Basics
Take the MBTI® Instrument
Hiring an MBTI® consultant
My MBTI® Results
Understanding MBTI® Type Dynamics
Type in Everyday Life
MBTI® Type at Work
Personality and Careers
Type Use in the Professions
Type and Learning
Psychological Type and Relationships
Type in Personal Growth
Using Type as a Professional
Become Certified to Administer the MBTI® Tool
MBTI® Certification Program
Training Applications
MBTI® Master Practitioners
MBTI® Step II Instrument
MBTI® Step III Instrument
Versions of the MBTI® Questionnaire
Purchasing MBTI® Materials
More About Type
Books & Articles
Research and the MBTI® Tool
MBTI® Organizations
International Use
Trusting MBTI® Information on the Web
Misconceptions about the MBTI® Assessment
Permissions
About Us
Objectives and Mission
Ethical Use of the MBTI® Instrument
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the ways to take the MBTI® assessment?
How do I purchase MBTI® materials?
What are the requirements to administer the MBTI® instrument?
How do I get permission to adapt the MBTI® instrument?
What are the guidelines for ethical use of the Myers Briggs® assessment?
Where can I find information about MBTI® research?
Legal - Privacy - Site Map - Unsubscribe -
The Myers & Briggs Foundation | 2815 NW 13th St., Suite 401 | Gainesville, FL 32609 | All rights reserved 2018
Share this site on Facebook Share this site on Twitter Share this site on LinkedIn