5.3

Reliability and Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® Instrument

From the Editor


The Research Digest highlights five studies from 2025 published across the globe. Rather than the traditional systematic review often seen in academic journals, two studies offer different types of research reviews. Erford conducted a synthesis of 25 years of studies on the psychometric properties and performance of the MBTI® Form M, calculating internal consistency, convergent validity across six personality instruments, and comparing type distribution in the aggregated sample against the normative sample in the MBTI Manual. The second study by H. Li presents a visual mapping analysis of research trends with the MBTI instrument from 1998–2018. The trajectory of research development with the MBTI instrument was identified in four stages: theory interpretation, model explanation, type performance, and type application.

For the last decade, the JPT-RD has always included at least one study on LLMs or artificial intelligence, and we anticipate this trend will only grow. This year, we summarize Kim’s research with LLMs and the MBTI personality system that has done something novel: it attempts to address the challenges of AI “hallucinations” by integrating psychoanalysis and the 16 MBTI personality type’s characteristics into constructing consciousness and personality modules.

The final two studies are deep dives into specific audiences and situations. First, Cybulko analyzes the impact of lawyers’ personality type on conflict resolution and mediation. This is an excellent analysis for anyone who finds value in a great example of applying a personality type lens in an analysis of a profession.

Last year, the JPT-RD included a special editorial on the explosion of the MBTI phenomenon in Asia with a review of several studies. J. Li’s study continues in this vein by bringing a cultural perspective to the interaction of personality types, emotional needs, and romantic relationship stability in Chinese college students. The results underscore the importance of considering both personality and cultural context in relationship counseling.

Later this year, look for announcements of the official launch of our Research Grant Program designed to support and fund academic research with the MBTI instruments. Our aim is to add to the significant history of research with the Myers-Briggs® system by building a body of rigorous research. One day soon, this Research Digest will include summaries of academic research from the Research Grant Program.

As always, we encourage and enjoy your responses to the research highlighted here and welcome suggestions for future inclusions.


Kesstan Blandin, Ph.D.
Vice President, Research & Development
Editor, Journal of Psychological Type® Research Digest

ARTICLE PERMALINK: https://www.myersbriggs.org/research-and-library/journal-psychological-type/from-the-editor-vol86/

ARTICLE COMMENTS:

Use the form below to leave comments on this article summary for the research team. Your name and email are required. Thank you.





Give us your thoughts on this article here:


Journal of Psychological Type® Research Digest (JPT-RD) is made available through Myers & Briggs Foundation, worldwide publisher. The editorial team includes Kesstan Blandin, PhD, Logan Abbitt, MLIS, and Purnima Sims.

For inquiries about accessing original articles, contact library@myersbriggs.org.

Myers & Briggs Foundation carries the legacy of Isabel Briggs Myers and the MBTI® instrument through our mission to educate the public about psychological type—including its ethical, meaningful, and practical applications—and to conduct research on psychological type and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI) instrument. The JPT-RD, published annually, is a publication that highlights research and ideas in the field of psychological type, the MBTI Instrument, and Jungian thought.

©2026 Myers & Briggs Foundation, Inc., publisher.

Contact the JPT-RD Editorial Team at research@myersbriggs.org.